The Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 series is a popular choice among both law enforcement and civilian shooters, offering a reliable and versatile platform. However, the choice between the full-size and compact models often leaves prospective buyers pondering the differences and which best suits their needs. This in-depth comparison will help you navigate the decision, weighing the pros and cons of each.
Size and Weight: The Defining Difference
The most obvious distinction lies in the physical dimensions. The M&P 2.0 Full Size boasts a larger grip and longer barrel, resulting in increased stability and accuracy during shooting. This translates to better control during rapid fire and a flatter trajectory. However, its larger size makes it less convenient for concealed carry or everyday carry (EDC).
Conversely, the M&P 2.0 Compact prioritizes concealability. Its shorter barrel and grip make it easier to carry discreetly, ideal for self-defense situations where a smaller profile is advantageous. The reduced size, though, comes at the cost of slightly reduced accuracy and control, especially for those with larger hands.
| Feature | M&P 2.0 Full Size | M&P 2.0 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Barrel Length | 4.25 inches | 3.6 inches |
| Overall Length | 7.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| Weight (Unloaded) | ~26 ounces | ~24 ounces |
| Grip Size | Full-size | Compact |
Capacity: More Rounds, More Power (Generally)
While the exact magazine capacity varies depending on the state and model configuration, the full-size M&P 2.0 generally holds more rounds than its compact counterpart. This increased capacity provides a greater advantage in defensive scenarios where sustained firepower might be needed. The compact model offers fewer rounds but compensates with its superior concealability.
Shootability and Recoil: A Matter of Preference and Skill
The longer barrel and larger grip of the full-size M&P 2.0 contribute to reduced recoil and enhanced accuracy. The added weight helps mitigate felt recoil, making it more comfortable to shoot, especially during extended range sessions. The compact model, while still manageable, exhibits slightly more noticeable recoil due to its smaller size and lighter weight. Experienced shooters might find this less of an issue, but beginners could find the full-size model more forgiving.
Concealability and Carry: Practicality vs. Performance
The compact's main advantage lies in its concealability. Its smaller size and weight make it easier to carry comfortably under clothing, ideal for individuals who prioritize discreet self-defense. The full-size model, while less concealable, offers superior shootability and accuracy. The choice depends heavily on individual needs and carry preferences.
Which One Should You Choose?
The decision boils down to your specific needs and priorities:
-
Choose the M&P 2.0 Full Size if: You prioritize accuracy, reduced recoil, higher capacity, and don't require concealability for everyday carry. Range shooting, home defense, or open carry scenarios are ideal applications.
-
Choose the M&P 2.0 Compact if: Concealability is paramount. You need a handgun for everyday carry and prioritize ease of concealment over slightly reduced accuracy and capacity.
Ultimately, handling both models is highly recommended before making a purchase. The best way to determine the right fit is to experience the differences firsthand at a gun range or shooting club. Consider factors like hand size, shooting experience, and intended use to make an informed decision. Remember to always prioritize safety and responsible gun ownership.
